About Contact
Thursday, June 4, 2026

Zero Club – Transport


The Zero Club (Part 11)  ·  Transport in Africa  ·  MDB Reform Platform

Transport in Africa: 7 Countries, 19 Projects, $1.65 Billion Committed, Zero Satisfactory

Bottom Line

The Transport Zero Club identifies seven African countries where the World Bank has never delivered a Satisfactory transport outcome — across 19 projects and $1.65 billion committed. The 44-point MS+/S+ gap across the full Transport portfolio is the widest of any sector in Africa: the Bank reports three-quarters of transport projects as successful, while less than a third meet the honest benchmark. The failure mode is structural: roads built, maintenance absent, institutional capacity not established. In the most recent decade, the record is even worse: the companion analysis (mdbreform.com/transport-record/) documents 4 cents on the dollar and four consecutive years (FY2019–22) of zero Satisfactory across 17 projects and $5.1 billion.

7countries in the Zero Club. DRC, Sierra Leone, Burundi, Lesotho, South Sudan, Guinea, Niger. Never once Satisfactory.
19Transport projects evaluated by IEG across seven countries. Not one rated Satisfactory or Highly Satisfactory.
$1.65bncommitted to Zero Club countries. DRC alone accounts for $948M — four projects, zero Satisfactory.
44ppMS+/S+ gap across all 142 Africa transport projects. The widest of any sector. 75% MS+ vs 31% S+.
📄
Full Paper — Transport Zero Club (PDF) IEG database (March 2026). 142 Transport projects in SSA (all-time). 7 Zero Club countries. The 44-point gap. Road maintenance failure pattern. Escape countries (Cameroon 80% S+, Rwanda 75%). Cross-sector overlap.
↓  Download Zero Club Paper (PDF)

The Accountability Gap

The World Bank’s Transport Global Practice committed $20.6 billion across 142 IEG-evaluated projects in Sub-Saharan Africa. The MS+ rate is 75.4 percent. The S+ rate is 31.0 percent. The 44-point gap is the widest of any sector in Africa — wider than Education (41pp), MTI (43pp), Energy (41pp), or Health (40pp). The Bank reports three-quarters of transport projects as successful. By the benchmark it applies to IFC and MIGA, less than one-third meet the standard.

THE 44-POINT GAP: Transport has the widest MS+/S+ gap of any sector in Africa. 75.4% MS+ versus 31.0% S+. Roads are built, usage targets met, but institutional capacity for maintenance, road safety, and sustained connectivity is not established. Projects achieve partial objectives (MS) without reaching the threshold for genuine success (S+).

The Seven Zero Club Countries

CountryProjectsCommittedS+ RatePattern
DRC4$948M0%Post-conflict. Largest transport commitment in the Zero Club. MS equilibrium in concentrated form.
Sierra Leone3$172M0%Post-conflict. Road rehabilitation without maintenance capacity.
Burundi3$141M0%Fragile state. Infrastructure without institutional foundation.
Lesotho3$131M0%Small state. All three MS — partial achievement on every project.
South Sudan2$130M0%Emergency operations. Bounded achievement in extreme fragility.
Guinea2$70M0%Both projects MU or below.
Niger2$58M0%Sahel fragility. Limited institutional absorption.

DRC dominates the Transport Zero Club as Ethiopia dominates Education: four projects, $948 million, not one Satisfactory. All seven Zero Club members also have 0% S+ in the recent decade (Closing FY 2015–2026), confirming the pattern is structural and ongoing — not a legacy of older projects.

The Core Failure Pattern: Build It, Don’t Maintain It

Transport’s failure mode is more uniform than other sectors. Across the Zero Club, IEG lessons repeat the same finding: roads are built, but road maintenance institutions, road funds, axle-load enforcement, and road safety systems are not established or sustained. The Bank finances construction. The country cannot maintain the asset. Within five to ten years, the infrastructure degrades to pre-project condition.

“The form of transport infrastructure expands — roads, bridges, corridors. The function — sustained connectivity, road safety, maintenance — does not.”

The Recent Decade: Even Worse

The companion analysis — The Transport Sector: Potholes Everywhere — examines the most recent decade (projects closing FY2015–2026) and finds the pattern has intensified: 4.1 percent S+ by commitment, twelve countries at zero Satisfactory on $5.9 billion, and four consecutive years (FY2019–22) with zero Satisfactory outcomes across 17 projects and $5.1 billion. The recent-decade analysis includes large borrowers — Kenya ($1.4bn), Ethiopia ($1.2bn), Nigeria ($918M) — that have historical Satisfactory projects but none in the past decade. The all-time Zero Club (this paper) identifies the seven countries where Transport has never delivered.

Where Transport Works

CountryS+ RateCommittedWhy It Worked
Cameroon80.0%$280MRoads Fund provides implementation discipline absent in health and education ministries.
Rwanda75.0%$163MState implementation discipline. Same governance foundation as education success.
Mauritania66.7%$93MFocused corridor projects with bounded objectives.
Zambia60.0%$487MRoad Development Agency with institutional continuity. Large portfolio, sustained performance.

The escape countries share a common feature: a dedicated institutional vehicle for road management that creates accountability for maintenance, not just construction. The Cameroon contrast is particularly telling: 80% S+ in Transport (Roads Fund) versus 0% S+ in both Health and Education (ministry-dependent). When a single-sector institution manages implementation, results improve dramatically.


The Case Study Series

#CaseCommitmentS+ RateStatus
1Nigeria Water$1.8bn0.4%Published
2Angola DPF$2.2bn0%Published
3South Africa Energy (Eskom)$9.13bnPublished
4Ghana FCI~$500M0%Published
5DRC Portfolio$6.7bn6.1%Published
6DRC Inga$107M+Published
7Somalia~$900M89%Published
8Rwanda$4.6bn68.5%Published
9Zero Club — MTI in Africa$10.4bn0%Published
10Zero Club — Health in Africa$3.0bn0%Published
11Zero Club — Transport in Africa$1.65bn0%This paper
12Zero Club — Education in Africa$2.5bn0%Published
📄
Companion Paper — The Transport Sector: Potholes Everywhere (PDF) The recent-decade analysis. Projects closing FY2015–2026. 4% S+ by commitment. 12 countries at zero. The Four-Year Zero. Food security nexus. The connective tissue argument.
↓  Download Potholes Paper (PDF)
The Bottom Line

The Transport Zero Club documents the third sector of sustained underperformance in the World Bank’s Africa portfolio. Seven countries, 19 projects, $1.65 billion committed, zero percent Satisfactory. The 44-point MS+/S+ gap is the widest of any sector in the series. The failure mode is structural: roads built, maintenance absent, institutional capacity not established.

The escape countries — Cameroon (80% S+), Rwanda (75%), Zambia (60%), Mauritania (67%) — share one feature: a dedicated institutional vehicle that creates accountability for road management, not just construction. The reform pathway is institutional, not infrastructural.

Browse by Topic